Legal Opinion

In Re Pipkin's Estate

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1959No. 38520PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

348 P.2d 330 (1959)

Matter of the ESTATE of B.V. PIPKIN, deceased.

Frances Lem Pipkin HIGGINS and James W. Pipkin, Plaintiffs in Error,

v.

Marshall W. PIPKIN, Defendant in Error.

No. 38520.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

December 22, 1959.

Dick Bell, Seminole, T.H. Williams, Jr., Wewoka, for plaintiffs in error.

J.T. Criswell, Prague, Raymond Criswell, Wewoka, for defendant in error.

BERRY, Justice.

B.V. Pipkin, hereafter referred to as "testatrix", died testate in 1957. In 1949 testatrix made a will in which she apparently named her sons and daughters, or if deceased at the time of her death, their issue,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re BauquierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Jenkins v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Higgins v. PipkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Constant v. BiggersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Merle v. RingwaldCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Ringwald v. MerleCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. In Re Estates of NicholsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API