Legal Opinion

Merle v. Ringwald

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 1995No. 84393PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Judge:

Appellant, Patricia Ringwald, seeks review of the trial court’s order which granted the motion of Appellee, Hazel Merle, Personal Representative of the Estate of William J. Ringwald, Deceased (hereafter “Merle”), for partial summary judgment. Appellant seeks review of this interlocutory probate order which additionally denied her petition for the appointment of a special administrator and which granted Merle’s motion for sanctions against Appellant. A previous order in this action was the subject of a prior appeal, In the Matter of Estate of Ringwald, 830 P.2d 1377…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. KaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Willis v. Nowata Land and Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Buck's Sporting Goods, Inc. of Tulsa v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Benham v. PlotnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. In Re the Estate of FullertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Carco Rentals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1996
  2. Brumark Corp. v. Corporation CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. In Re Estate of WebbCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. McGahey v. McGaheyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API