Legal Opinion

Constant v. Biggers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1976No. 49652PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice:

This is original proceeding commenced by Pauline H. Constant, Executrix of the estate of Constantine D. [Gus] Eugenicos, deceased. Petitioner asks this Court to assume jurisdiction and issue writ of mandamus and prohibition to Honorable Bill Big-gers directing him to vacate letters testamentary issued to Frank Seay and to refrain from further appointments of executors not named in will.

On March 25, 1976, the last will and testament of Constantine D. [Gus] Eugenicos was admitted to probate in Wewoka Division of District Court of Seminole County. Under terms of will, petitioner,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs of Harmon Cty. v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Secrest v. SecrestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Lauridsen v. Superior Ct.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. Pitchford v. District Court of the 24th Judicial District of OklahomaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. In Re Pipkin's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
  2. Jim Marrs Drilling Co. v. WoolardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. City of Lawton v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Ringwald v. MerleCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. In Re Estates of NicholsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API