Legal Opinion
Smith v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 1937No. 8511PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court for the Territory of Hawaii discharging a writ of'habeas corpus.
The situation disclosed by the petition for the writ and by the record is that one Grace E. Smith was indicted, with others, by the grand jury for the Southern District of California for conspiring to violate the Mann White Slave Traffic Act (section 2, 18 U.S.C.A. § 398); 18 U.S.C.A. § 88. The indictment, set out in the record at pages 91 to 94, does not allege that the conspiracy was formed in the Southern District of California, nor does it allege any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Grigg v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Charlie Wong v. EsolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Armone, Stephen Grammauta, Vincent Pacelli, and Nicholas ViscardiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Michael Pasterchik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Hithe v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Kitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Ladner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.