People v. Ognibene
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
Peter Sabatino Ognibene appeals his conviction for nine counts of grand theft. He contends his due process rights were violated when the trial court refused an instruction on a time-barred lesser related offense even though he was willing to waive the statute of limitations. We affirm.
*1288Ognibene was charged with nine counts of grand theft for taking funds from nine automobile agencies. He bought cars from individuals, reduced the mileage shown on the odometers, and sold the cars to used car dealers. At the end of his defense, Ognibene requested a jury instruction on the lesser…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cowan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. DelisleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- State v. TimoteoHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. OvermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.