Legal Opinion
Adam Vargas v. Northrop Grumman Corporation; Patrick Moisan; Herschel Hill; and Does 1 to 100, inclusive
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 23, 2026No. 2:26-cv-01879Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM VARGAS, Case No. 2:26-cv-01879-SPG-MAR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 12 v. REMAND TO STATE COURT [ECF 13 NO. 15] 14 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION; PATRICK MOISAN; 15 HERSCHEL HILL; and DOES 1 to 100, 16 inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court is the Motion for an Order to Remand to State Court, (ECF No. 15 20 (“Motion”)), filed by Plaintiff Adam Vargas (“Plaintiff”). The Court has read and 21 considered the matters raised with respect to the Motion and determined that this matter is 22…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Richard M. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.