Legal Opinion
Bonner v. Fuji Photo Film
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 13, 2006No. C 06-04374 CRBPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BREYER, District Judge.
Now pending before the Court are (1) Plaintiffs Motion to Remand and (2) Plaintiffs Motion to Join Additional Defendants. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motions are DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Dorsi Bonner claims that her picture has been misappropriated and used on packaging for disposable cameras. She does not know exactly how her likeness made its way onto the cameras, but she wants someone to pay for it — to the tune of some undetermined amount, but not less than $75,000. She asserts various causes of action under California law for the wrong…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Robert H. Harris v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company Kenneth L. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Samuel "Wesley" McCabe and John Elson v. General Foods Corporation, Alan Moltz, Abner Ladson and Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Jeffrey D. Brierly, Administrator of the Estate of Paul Brierly v. Alusuisse Flexible Packaging, Inc. David EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Donald Newcombe v. Adolf Coors Company Foote, Cone and Belding and Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Destfino v. ReiswigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Lewis v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Coleman v. Assurant, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
- Carrasco v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Lavery-Madruga v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022