Legal Opinion
Martin v. Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young & Jones, P.C.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 10, 2008No. Civil Action 06-303 GMSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GREGORY M. SLEET, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On May 8, 2006, the plaintiff, Helen D. Martin (“Martin”), filed the present lawsuit against the Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young, & Jones, P.C. (the “defendant”), alleging that the defendant violated her constitutional rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and the Delaware State Discrimination Act, Del.Code Ann. tit. 19, § 710 et seq. Martin, an African American female, further alleges that she was subjected to a hostile work environment and constructively…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Haskins v. CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICESDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- GHAFOOR-DAVIS v. COMMUNITY ACTION LEHIGH VALLEYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025