Legal Opinion

Stamatis v. Johnson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1950No. 5227PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAULKNER, Superior Judge.

Appellees (plaintiffs below) brought suit against appellants (defendants below) for a mandatory injunction to compel the latter to reopen and restore to its former condition an open irrigation ditch located on the defendants’ land' and in which plaintiffs claimed a prescriptive right of use. Judgment for mandatory injunction and permanently enjoining the defendants from interfering with the ditch was granted. From this judgment defendants have apr pealed.

The undisputed testimony shows that the open irrigation ditch involved in this action was used by plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. White Bros. v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Brown v. BradburySupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Beville v. AllenArizona Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Roaring Fork Club, L.P. v. St. Jude's Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Davis v. BrukSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Jones Et Ux v. Edwards Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. R.C.R., Inc. v. Rainbow Canyon, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Inch v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API