Legal Opinion

Beville v. Allen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1925No. Civil No. 2082PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Emma P. Allen, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Paul Beville, hereinafter called defendant, asking for injunctive relief and damages. She alleged substantially that she was the owner of certain real estate in the town of Mesa, that defendant was the owner of certain other real estate therein, and that she and her grantors had for thirty-five years openly, notoriously, adversely, and under claim of right, owned and exercised an easement over defendant’s property for conveying irrigation water to her premises. She further set up that defendant had obstructed and filled up the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilman v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Riverside Dairy & Stock FarmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. BorskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Whitaker v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Stamatis v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Lane v. MathewsArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API