Legal Opinion

In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 15, 2013No. 06 MD 1789(JFK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

JOHN F. KEENAN, District Judge:

Before the Court is a motion to dismiss brought by the Generic Manufacturer Defendants (“Generic Defendants”). For the reasons that follow, Generic Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Background

Plaintiffs in this case were prescribed Fosamax and its generic equivalent, alendronate sodium, an oral bisphosphonate. This MDL involves claims that Fosamax, manufactured by Merck, or its generic equivalent, manufactured by the Generic Defendants, caused users to suffer from a condition known as osteonecrosis of the jaw (“ONJ”).…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Reglan LitigationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  2. Allbright v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
  3. Montero v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API