Legal Opinion

State v. Sandoval

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 2002No. 22,294PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1} Defendant Anthony Sandoval appeals his sentence under the Habitual Offender Act (the Act). NMSA 1978, § 31-18-17 (1993). The principal question he raises is whether the district court may commence trial if it does not grant a timely-filed petition for extension of time under Rule 5-604 NMRA 2002 until after the six-month time limit for commencement of trial has expired. We hold that Rule 5-604 requires the district court to act on the petition for extension prior to the expiration of the six-month period for commencement of trial. We therefore reverse Defendant’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SantillanesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Spingola v. SpingolaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Drinkwater v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. EdenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CardenasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API