State v. Sandoval
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Defendant Anthony Sandoval appeals his sentence under the Habitual Offender Act (the Act). NMSA 1978, § 31-18-17 (1993). The principal question he raises is whether the district court may commence trial if it does not grant a timely-filed petition for extension of time under Rule 5-604 NMRA 2002 until after the six-month time limit for commencement of trial has expired. We hold that Rule 5-604 requires the district court to act on the petition for extension prior to the expiration of the six-month period for commencement of trial. We therefore reverse Defendant’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SantillanesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Spingola v. SpingolaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Drinkwater v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. EdenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CardenasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003