Legal Opinion

Drinkwater v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1975No. State 73, 172PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The basic situation in each of these cases is identical. Each defendant was convicted and placed on probation. Subsequently, each defendant was convicted of another offense and sentenced to prison for that offense. As a result of the later conviction, the probation on the first conviction was revoked, and in each case the revoking trial judge ordered that the sentence imposed after the revocation of probation in the first conviction was to be served consecutive to the sentence imposed after placing the defendant on probation.

It is the argument of each of the defendants, Willie Lee Drinkwater…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Hayes v. StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Drewniak v. State Ex Rel. JacquestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Weston v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State ex rel. Zabel v. Municipal Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. HornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. KruseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. SzulczewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API