Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Klamath Lake R.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1909PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Multnomah: Earl C. Bronaugh, Judge. This is an action by A. A. Cunningham against the Klamath Lake Railroad Company, to recover damages for a personal injury. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

This action was commenced in Multnomah County, Oregon, to recover damages for a personal injury. The complaint states in effect that defendant is a foreign corporation, engaged in business as a common carrier, and that, complying with the laws of this State, it had appointed John W. Alexander of Portland, as its attorney in fact and resident general agent, who was its representative; that on June 19, 1907, the plaintiff, a resident of Portland, was a passenger on one of defendant’s trains from Pokegama, Klamath County, Oregon, to Thrall, Siskiyou County,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Warren v. CrosbyOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Farrell v. Oregon Gold Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Aldrich v. Anchor Coal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Holgate v. Oregon Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kahn v. TazwellOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Rorick v. Dalles CityOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Messick v. DubyOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Dixie Meadows Independence Mines Co. v. KightOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hamilton v. North Pac. S. S. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API