Legal Opinion

Warren v. Crosby

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1893PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Clatsop County: Thos. A. McBride, Judge. Action by M. S. Warren against M. C. Crosby, mayor of the city of Astoria, Oregon, and others, to enjoin such city from incurring further expense in assessing and collecting the city taxes for the year 1893. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Lord

This is a suit brought by a taxpayer of the city of Astoria to enjoin the city from incurring any further expense in assessing and collecting a city tax for the year 1893. The question sought to be raised is the right of the city of Astoria to assess and collect a city tax for said *559year in disregard of the general law of the state. The contention is that the general act amends section 38 of the special act incorporating the city of Astoria, in violation of section 22, article IV. of the constitution, which provides that “ no act shall ever be revised or amended by mere reference to its title,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
  3. Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Branham v. LangeIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Tuskaloosa Bridge Co. v. OlmsteadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Yelle v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Spokane Grain & Fuel Co. v. LyttakerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Northern Counties Trust v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Spratt v. Helena Power Transmission Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State Tax Commission v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1934

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API