Legal Opinion

Rorick v. Dalles City

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1932PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is a suit by plaintiff, a taxpayer, to enjoin the defendant, Dalles City, a municipal corporation, from issuing and selling bridge bonds aggregating the sum of $650,000, the proceeds of which are to be used in the construction of a toll bridge over and across the Columbia river. The proposed bonds are to be issued pursuant to chapter 173, Laws 1931, and their issuance and sale has been authorized by a majority of the legal voters of the city at an election held pursuant to that act.

The ground alleged in the complaint for injunctive relief is that, by their issuance and sale, the city…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pacific Elevator Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. McClain v. Regents of the UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Little v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Portland v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. City of Joseph v. Joseph Water Works Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. DeFazio v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Moses v. MeierOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Ronnow v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State Ex Rel. Kane v. GoldschmidtOregon Supreme Court · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API