Legal Opinion

Dixie Meadows Independence Mines Co. v. Kight

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1935PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Plaintiffs assign that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to plaintiffs’ amended complaint and rendering a judgment of dismissal of the suit. Plaintiffs’ suit is a direct attack on the decree in the former suit. A suit in equity brought to avoid a decree for want of service is not a collateral attack: Lieblin v. Breyman Leather Co., 82 Or. 22 (160 P. 1167); Morrill v. Morrill, 20 Or. 96 (25 P. 362, 11 L. R. A. 155, 23 Am. St. Rep. 95); Acton v. Lamberson, 102 Or. 472 (202 P. 421, 732). In the latter case it was held, in effect, that any attack which has for its object the setting…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Morrill v. MorrillOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. McDaniel v. McElvySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Ricketson v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Northcut v. LemeryOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Acton v. LambersonOregon Supreme Court · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bernards v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. In Re Estate of MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Kintigh v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lincoln Loan Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Decker v. WimanOregon Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API