Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 17, 1997No. CR 96-482Published

1Opinion of the Court

941 S.W.2d 387 (1997)

327 Ark. 652

Randolph George HICKS, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

No. CR 96-482.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 17, 1997.

Edward Witt Chandler, Wayne Emmons, Memphis, for Appellant.

Winston Bryant, Attorney General, Kent G. Holt, Assistant Attorney General, Little Rock, for Appellee.

THORNTON, Justice.

Appellant Randolph G. Hicks was convicted of one count of delivery of a controlled substance to Mark Lamm, a second count of delivery of a controlled substance to Rodney Silvers, one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, and one count of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Brown; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Imber.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. United States v. Frank Williams, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API