Legal Opinion

Gaard v. First Trust & Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 6, 1926PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

De GRApp, 0.

I. This is a railroad crossing case, but the railroad company is not a party in interest. The plaintiff, however, has introduced the railroad by reason of the logic of the written argument, in that it is contended that, had the defendants' decedent commenced an action against the railroad to recover damages predicated on the negligence of the railroad, the cause of action would fail by virtue of his contributory negligence; therefore, such contributory negligence became the primary negligence upon which plaintiff is entitled to base an action to recover damages against the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Platter v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Kroy v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. Gray v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Dalton v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Frederickson v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Nelson v. NygrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. E. N. Albert v. Maher Brothers' Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Gardner v. PereboomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Orr v. Des Moines Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Phillips v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API