Legal Opinion

Dalton v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 25, 1901PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Louisa District Court. — Hon. W. S. Withrow, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for the death of James E. Dalton, due, as is alleged, to the negligence of the defendant. The case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

1 This is a second appeal. The opinion-on the first will be found in 104 Iowa, 27, where enough of the facts are stated to show the basis of the first assignment of error. On the second trial the case went to a jury, and the court instructed in one paragraph of the charge as follows: “In the absence of direct evidence of the conduct of deceased upon approaching the track of defendant’s railway, the law presumes, from the natural instinct of persons to avoid danger, that he exercised ordinary-care and prudence, until the contrary appears, but the presumption thus created applies only when…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hudson v. C., & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Thompson v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Langworthy v. Township of GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Baker v. IrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Zucker v. . WhitridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Platter v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Gray v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API