Legal Opinion

Gray v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 1, 1909PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from Cedar District Court. — Hon. W. N. Trieci-iler, Judge. Action at law for damages. .Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Plaintiff’s intestate, F. M. Gray, was killed by a passing train upon a highway crossing of the defendant’s railway. This action, is brought to recover the. resulting damages to his estate on the theory that defendant was negligent in failing to give the proper crossing signals, in the rate of speed at which the train was moving, in failing to use ordinary oare to see the deceased or to know of his approach to the track, and in neglecting to place a whistling post or other suitable sign to indicate to the engineman the proper place for giving the crossing signals. The answer denied generally…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Lunde v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Hopkinson v. Knapp & Spalding Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Kinyon v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Gray v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Platter v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
  4. Rau v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Whaley v. VidalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API