Legal Opinion
Powers-Bunce v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 16, 2008No. Civil Action 06-1586 (RMC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
On May 6, 2008, Officer Michael Burdyn and Sergeant Benita Giles of the United States Secret Service — Uniform Division (the “Federal Defendants”) moved the Court to reconsider its decision denying their renewed motion for summary judgment, in which they asserted, inter alia, qualified immunity as a defense to the Fourth Amendment excessive force claim. 1 The Federal Defendants contend that the First Amended Complaint failed to plead a valid constitutional violation and that, even if it did, qualified immunity was an appropriate defense to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scott-Blanton v. Universal City Studios Productions LLLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Fort Sill Apache Tribe v. Nat'l Indian Gaming Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- POWERS-BUNCE v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Engelund v. DollDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Fort Sill Apache Tribe v. National Indian Gaming CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.