Legal Opinion

Denver & Rio Grande R. R. v. Stark

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Cotort of Montrose County.

1Opinion of the Court

Richmond, C.

This was a proceeding instituted by appellant herein for the purpose of condemning a right of way through a tract of land owned by the appellee, H. M. Stark, and situate in the county of Montrose, Colorado.

To the petition answer was filed, and thereafter a jury selected for the purpose of determining the compensation to be awarded. To the manner of selecting the jury appellant objected, and also to the instruction of the court. The trial resulted in a judgment for appellee for the sum of $1,368. Motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial duly made and overruled.

*292Many…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pueblo & Arkansas Valley R. R. v. RuddSupreme Court of Colorado · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. NobleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. GriffithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Denver, Northwestern & Pacific Railway Co. v. HoweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Otero Canal Co. v. HungerfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. Rio Grande Southern Railway Co. v. KnightColorado Court of Appeals · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API