Legal Opinion

Colorado Cent. R. v. Allen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1889PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Larimer County Court. On rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott

In September, 1877, appellant filed in the county court its petition to condemn for railway purposes certain lands belonging to the defendant, Cora Allen, who was then a non-resident of the state. The petition contained no averment of the value of the lands sought to be taken, nor of the amount involved in the proceeding. An order *231of publication was made, notice was published, and the defendant Cora, not appearing, was defaulted. Commissioners were thereupon appointed, who reported the compensation for her said lands to be $180. This report was filed and approved October 9, 1877, and no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Wells v. CaywoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  3. Brisbine v. St. Paul & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  4. Milwaukee & Northern Railroad v. StrangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Knoth v. BarclaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lamborn v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Lavelle v. Town of JulesburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. People ex rel. Wayman v. ZimmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. De Votie v. McGerrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Pine Martin Mining Co. v. Empire Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1932

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API