Legal Opinion

Baer Bros. Mercantile Co. v. Denver & R. G. R.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 26, 1912No. 5,611PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Action by the Baer Bros. Mercar tile Company against the Denver & Rio.Grande Railroad Company to enforce payment of reparation awarded plaintiff by orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission. ' On demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, District Judge.

This is a suit in two counts seeking to enforce the payment of reparations awarded plaintiff by two orders of *615the Interstate Commerce Commission. It lias been submitted to the court upon a demurrer challenging the sufficiency of each count. The two causes of action are substantially outlined as follows: After setting out the corporate existence of the plaintiff and of the defendant and also of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, which constitutes defendant’s connecting carrier from Pueblo eastward to St. Louis, plaintiff alleges the shipment of certain beer from St.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Kentucky & I. Bridge Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1889
  3. Western New York & P. R. Co. v. Penn Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1892
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Midland Valley R. Co. v. Excelsior Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API