Legal Opinion
Osei-Kuffnor v. Argana
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 8, 1993No. 92-CV-148PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellant, Dorothy Osei-Kuffnor, appeals from the grant of judgment under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 12(c) to appellee Maria A. Argana on the grounds that the motions judge erred in ruling that her personal injury claim was barred by res judicata. We affirm.
I
Appellant filed a complaint in the Superi- or Court of the District of Columbia against appellee Maria Argana on February 11,1991. Appellee answered on February 21, 1991, and filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Super.Ct.Civ.R. 12(c) on August 9, 1991, on the grounds of res judicata.
Appellee’s motion stated that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Goldkind v. Snider Bros., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cecil Tutt v. Lewis DobyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Tillman v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Wyman v. RoesnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Beretta, U.S.A., Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Abdullah v. RoachDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Federal Marketing Co. v. Virginia Impression Products Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Molovinsky v. Monterey Cooperative, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Blackman v. Visiting Nurses Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.