Legal Opinion

Molovinsky v. Monterey Cooperative, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1997No. 95-CV-1535PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant Gale S. Molovinsky filed a small claims suit demanding the return of his earnest money deposit under a cooperative apartment purchase agreement which fell through. After settling the claim and dismissing the suit with prejudice, Molovinsky filed suit in the Civil Actions Branch, which had general jurisdiction, demanding $400,000 compensatory and punitive damages on a breach of contract theory and a statutory discrimination theory. The trial court ruled that the contract count was barred under the doctrine of res judicata, and that the dis crimination count…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. A. Ernest Fitzgerald v. Robert C. Seamans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Patton v. KleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Carr v. RoseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Shin v. Portals Confederation Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Bolinger v. Bell AtlanticNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Herrion v. Children'S Hospital Natl. Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API