Legal Opinion
Demiraj v. Uljaj
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 4, 2012No. AC 33219PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Péndola Demiraj, individually and doing business as Eagle Agency, and Halim Demiraj, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, following a jury trial, in favor of the defendants, Tom Uljaj, Eli Gjezo and Adriatic Eagle Air Corporation (Adriatic). On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly directed a verdict in favor of the defendants on two counts alleging violations of the Connecticut *802Uniform Securities Act (CUSA), General Statutes § 36b-2 et seq., and specifically General Statutes § 36b-4 (a) and (b). We reverse in part the judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Curran v. KrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Levesque v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kosiorek v. SmigelskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Millette v. Connecticut Post Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Farrell v. Johnson & JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018