Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Johnson & Johnson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 18, 2018No. AC39472PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The plaintiffs, Mary Beth Farrell and Vincent Farrell, 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following a jury trial, in favor of the defendants Brian J. Hines, M.D., and Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, LLC (Urogynecology). 2 On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court (1) abused its discretion by allowing the defendants to refer during trial to prior defendants, the claims against whom had been withdrawn; (2) abused its discretion by excluding from evidence as hearsay two journal articles; (3) improperly directed a verdict in favor of the defendants on the plaintiffs'…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Johnson v. HealySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Gibson v. CapanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farrell v. Johnson & JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API