Legal Opinion
Connecticut National Bank v. Giacomi
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 30, 1995No. 15089PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether a person who “aids and abets” another person’s fraudulent conduct in connection with a securities transaction has violated General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 36-472 of the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act (CUSA).1 The plaintiff, Connecticut National Bank (CNB),2 brought suit, as payee, against the defendants,3 as makers of promissory notes that were payable on demand. The defendants, all among the group of investors in the now defunct Great Rings Limited Partner*307ship (Great Rings), did not deny that they had executed the notes or that demand had…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,351 Billie Jean Woodward v. Metro Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Iit, An International Investment Trust v. Bernard CornfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- IIT v. CornfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Massameno v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gore v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Friezo v. FriezoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.