Bar Assn. of S. F. v. Cantrell
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING for the modification'of a judgment of suspension of an attorney at law. Judgment vacated. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
On the seventeenth day of June, 1921, the petitioner, Russell W. Cantrell, filed a petition in this court asking for a modification of a judgment rendered by this court on the fifth day of October, 1920 (49 Cal. App. 468, [193 Pac. 598]), which judgment ordered the suspension of the petitioner from his office as an attorney for the period of one year; on the same date he prepared a notice of motion directed to “Perry Evans, Esq., Attorney for Accusant,” and caused said papers to be served on said attorney on the same day. The notice stated that the motion would be made on the twenty-first day…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re SimpsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- In re SimpsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- In re TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- In re HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- In re NewtonMontana Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Friday v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re CateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- People Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.