Legal Opinion

Bachman v. Reynolds Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1936No. 6230PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This suit was commenced by respondents, Bachmans, Kennison, McMillan and Simpson, for the purpose of determining their rights to the waters originating at certain springs, variously known and referred to as Warm Springs, McQuat Springs and Walter Butte Springs. The trial court adjudicated the waters of Warm Springs Creek (the waters of the above springs) basing the awards to each of the parties upon diversion of water and application to beneficial use, as follows: To appellant Keith, 1.72 cubic feet per second with priority of April 1, 1917; to respondents McMillan and Simpson (one tract of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Nielson v. ParkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Reno v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Gould v. HillIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BlakneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. SnoderlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Idaho Lumber & Hardware Co. v. DiGiacomoIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Nordick v. SorensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Hagan v. ClydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API