Legal Opinion

Idaho Lumber & Hardware Co. v. DiGiacomo

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1940No. 6729PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This action is one to foreclose a material-man’s lien. The material facts are substantially: Appellant John DiGiacomo, on or about July 15, 1937, called at respondent’s place of business for the purpose of securing a contractor to remodel his house. At respondent’s suggestion one Newbold, and later, one Moore, both carpenters, called upon DiGiacomo, examined the dwelling and thereafter Moore submitted an estimate of the cost of remodeling. Thereafter Moore and Newbold called at respondent’s place of business and had a contract drafted which was then submitted to DiGiacomo, some changes made…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Chamberlain v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Clinton v. Utah Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hill v. Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Dybvig v. WillisIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Latham v. GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Crenshaw v. CrenshawIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Guyman v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Layrite Products Company v. LuxIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API