Legal Opinion

Automatic Draft & Stove Co. v. Works

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided July 16, 1940No. 18PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this case is a Virginia corporation having its principal place of business at Lynchburg, Virginia. The defendant-intervener, which will hereinafter be called the defendant, is an Illinois corporation having its place of business at New Athens, Illinois.

The case involves the alleged infringement of two patents owned by the plaintiff, the first being patent No. 1,786,931, issued to Camb J. Ashley on December 30, 1930, and the second a patent No. 2,170,728, issued to Charles D. Montague on August 22, 1939. These patents respectively will hereinafter be…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thurber Corporation v. Fairchild Motor Corporation and Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1941
  3. Long v. DickDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API