Legal Opinion

Day v. Patterson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL from the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit to quiet title. Judgement for the defendant. The case is as follows:

Ezekiel M. JDay filed his complaint in the Clark Circuit Court, alleging that he was the owner, by purchase from Marsh and Eiger, of a certain piece of ground containing *115about twenty-one acres; that when he purchased and paid for it, at the commencement of his ownership, there was a mortgage upon it, given by said Marsh and Kiger', to Wood, Abbott $ Co., which mortgage covered, not only said twenty-one acres, but about 380 acres in addition; that subsequently, said defendant, Patterson, purchased the remaining 380 acres…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bird v. LaniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Cupps v. IrvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1827

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Miller v. BillingslyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. McDill v. GunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Houston v. HoustonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Rodenbarger v. BramblettIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Chester v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API