Legal Opinion

Auxier v. Holmes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1980No. WD 30728PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

This is an action to quiet title and a counterclaim seeking to establish a prescriptive easement. Judgment quieted title in appellant. Judgment also established a prescriptive easement to the use of respondent. The judgment is affirmed.

This appeal is directed to that portion of the judgment establishing the prescriptive easement. Appellants allege two points of error, which in summary contend that the circuit court erred in finding the evidence supported respondents’ open and notorious use of the entire lane, and that the circuit court erred in finding the evidence supported…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Dalton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Speer v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. Moravek v. OcsodyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. George v. DickinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnston v. BatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Lacy v. SchmitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Moss v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Soderholm v. NaumanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Gault v. BahmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API