Legal Opinion

Cromer Ex Rel. Martin v. Lounsbury Chiropractic Offices, Inc.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided October 14, 1994No. Civ. A. 1:94-0258PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABER, District Judge.

I. Introduction

In this civil action filed on March 31, 1994, the plaintiffs combine claims under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125, with several causes of action under West Virginia law. The sole basis for federal jurisdiction is plaintiffs’ contention that this action presents a federal question under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 because it “arises under” the laws of the United States due to the Lanham Act claim. Plaintiffs also contend that this court has supplemental jurisdiction over the related state law claims. The defendants have moved to dismiss…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Tom Waits v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Tracy-Locke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. MatkariCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Richardson-Vicks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Crump v. Beckley Newspapers, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Katzman v. Victoria's Secret CatalogueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. Condit v. Star Editorial, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2003
  3. Maday v. Toll Bros. Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API