Legal Opinion

Condit v. Star Editorial, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 15, 2003No. CIV F 02-6004 OWW L.JPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Lanham Act Claim) PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6)

WANGER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this diversity action, Defendants move to dismiss for lack of standing and failure to state a claim, Carolyn Condit’s (“Plaintiff’) fourth claim for violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act [15 U.S.C. § 1125(A)], against STAR EDITORIAL, INC. and AMERICAN MEDIA, INC. (“Defendants”), arising from statements printed in the September 11, 2Ó01, issue of Defendants’ publication, The Star. See…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Western Mining Council v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stayart v. YAHOO! INC.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
  2. Arnold v. TreadwellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  3. Yeager v. Innovus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API