Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1918No. Civ. No. 2379PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLY, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff was injured on the ninth day of November, 1912, while leaving a Southern Pacific train at Madrone Station, in Santa Clara County, and defendant appeals from a judgment in her favor on account thereof entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury.

The first claim of defendant is of a variance between the complaint and the proofs of plaintiff, it being claimed that the complaint alleged only that plaintiff was thrown from the train and that this is not shown by the evidence.

Plaintiff’s cause of action as stated in her complaint is that while she was a passenger on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Craven v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Carr v. River & Eureka RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Raub v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Maxwell v. Fresno City Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Campbell v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McBride v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Cronholm v. SheldonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API