Legal Opinion

Raub v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1894No. 19317PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff took passage upon a car of the defendant to be transported from Glendale to De Camp station. De Camp station is a station upon the road of the defendant within the limits of the city of Los Angeles, and is printed upon the published time table and list of its stations. The defendant does not issue tickets from Glendale for that station, but for all stations or stopping places within the limits of Los Angeles tickets are sold to Los Angeles. The trains of the defendant always stop at this station, and passengers are accustomed to get off and on at that place. The plaintiff had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carr v. River & Eureka RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McBride v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Jones v. United Railroads of S. F.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Riley v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Porters Bar Dredging Co. v. BeaudryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Schwartz v. ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API