Russell v. City of Idaho Falls
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice.
Respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company hereinafter sometimes is called the Railroad, and respondent City of Idaho Falls, the City.
Appellant Beatrice P. Russell seeks recovery of damages for the death of her husband Charles F. Russell, which occurred August 31, 1954, by electrocution allegedly caused by the negligence of respondents. Appellant Walter C. Musgrave, as Manager of State Insurance Fund, asserts subrogated rights of recovery of the amounts of workmen’s compensation benefits the Fund has paid and become obligated to pay, growing out of the death of decedent as a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Hooton v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Lorang v. HaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Gifford v. NottinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Moon v. ErvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tucker v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Smith v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Domingo v. PhillipsIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Shields v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.