Margetan v. Superior Chair Craft Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
In order to decide whether the plaintiff commenced his action in time to toll the statute of limitations, we must determine when he “filed” his complaint. Was it when he delivered his complaint to the clerk’s office? Or was it when he paid the filing fee? We conclude a complaint is not filed until the filing fee is paid. Because appellant Margetan paid no filing fee until after the statute of limitations had run, the trial court correctly dismissed his action as time barred.
George Margetan desired to sue Superior Chair Craft Company for a personal injury incurred on December 3, 1993.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. AlvarezWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Douchette v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Diane Rodgers, on Behalf of Sharon Jones, A/K/A Sharon Rodgers v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Martin v. TriolWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Nearing v. Golden State Foods Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lewis County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Lewis County v. W. WA. GMHBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Holt v. GambillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Holt v. GambillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004