Legal Opinion

Smiley v. Read

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1912No. L.A. No. 2876PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff and defendants entered into an agreement whereby the former promised to purchase and the latter covenanted to sell certain real property described in the contract as “The 10.90 acres in the southwest corner of Grand and Minnehaha aves., known as the Geo. Read Tract.” Thereafter defendants caused their land to be platted and a portion thereof to be dedicated for street purposes. A part of said property was designated as “Lot 1 of tract 478,” and a deed indicating it by that form of description was tendered to plaintiff. He accepted the deed, paid the balance of the purchase price…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Gregg v. Von PhulSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. Herzog v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R.R.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Sunrise Land Co. v. RootCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Joyce v. TomasiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Johnson v. SchimpfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ram's Gate Winery, LLC v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. George v. WestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API