Legal Opinion

McCamly v. Waterhouse

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1891No. 3061PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The opinion contains a statement.

1Opinion of the Court

MARR, Judge.

The following, in quotation marks, is adopted from appellant’s brief:

“Suit by appellees against appellant in the District Court upon a note executed by appellant to the order of Mrs. Maggie Dennis, wife of I. K. Dennis, for $400, purchase money of a lot in the town of Wharton conveyed to appellant by Mrs. Dennis and husband, the note and deed retaining an express vendor’s lien. The note was indorsed by Mrs. Dennis and delivered to her husband, and was by her husband then delivered before maturity to appellees, and afterward before maturity, but after the wife’s death, the husband…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kempner v. Comer, Fairris & DialTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cannon v. McDanielTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Gunst v. PelhamTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Russell & Seisfeld v. KirkbrideTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Baker v. ComptonTexas Supreme Court · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Willis v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Fennimore v. InghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. RickerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Stacy v. DeleryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Ritchie County Bank v. BeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API