Legal Opinion

Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Ricker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1895No. 717PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Associate Justice.

Suit brought by William Bicker against the insurance company to recover the amount stated in the insurance policy sued on, part of the property therein described having been destroyed by fire. Cosnahan intervened, claiming an equitable interest in the policy. Judgment for Bicker and Cosnahan for the amount of property destroyed, from which this appeal was taken.

Conclusions of Fact.—The property covered by the policy in suit was purchased by C. P. Bicker from Cosnahan, the terms being $250 cash and three notes each for $250, given by C. P. Bicker to Cosnahan. The deed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hough v. City Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  2. Dunlap's Adm'r v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Wainer v. Milford Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Pelton v. . Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Stephens v. MotlTexas Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Cooper Industries, Ltd. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. Hamburg-Bremen Fire Insurance v. RuddellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Lowe v. Michigan Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. De Shazo v. EubankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API