Kempner v. Comer, Fairris & Dial
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before Hon. W. H. Stewart.
1Opinion of the Court
Collard, Judge.—
T. L. Fairris, one of the firm of Comer, Fairris & Dial, before maturity, signed his wife’s (C. A. Fairris’) name on the back of her three promissory notes payable to her order and delivered, them so endorsed to his firm to be by them hypothecated for credit,. *199Mrs. Fairris knowing nothing oí the transaction or the intended use of her notes. The firm deposited the notes with appellants as collateral, who advanced money and gave credit to Comer, Fairris & Dial in the belief that the notes were regularly endorsed by the payee, though they did not know the payee or that she was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nichols v. DibrellTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Inge v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Gardner v. DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Jacobs v. HawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- McAlpin v. BurnettTexas Supreme Court · 1857
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Red River National Bank v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Hermann v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Andrews Et Ux. v. SEC. Bank of W. F.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
- Stephens v. LPP MORTGAGE, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Coleman v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1901
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.