People v. Trantham
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
Counsel Jay M. Kohorn for Defendant and Appellant. Ira Reiner, City Attorney, Jack L. Brown and Greg Wolff, Deputy City Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Opinion
COOPERMAN, J.
—Following a jury trial, defendant Roger Kenneth Tran-tham was found guilty as charged in a misdemeanor complaint with entering, remaining, staying or loitering in a park between the hours of 10:30 p.m. and 5 a.m. of the following day. (L.A. Mun. Code, § 63.44, subd. (B)(14) [hereafter, section (or §) 63.44(B)(14)].) We find no merit to defendant’s position on appeal and…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nunez v. City Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Nunez v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- City & County of San Francisco v. Eller Outdoor AdvertisingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. DavenportAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1985
- People v. TranthamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.