Legal Opinion
People v. Trantham
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1984No. 21191PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
161 Cal.App.3d 1 (1984)
208 Cal. Rptr. 535
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ROGER KENNETH TRANTHAM, Defendant and Appellant.
Docket No. 21191.
Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.
July 30, 1984.
COUNSEL
Jay M. Kohorn for Defendant and Appellant.
Ira Reiner, City Attorney, Jack L. Brown and Greg Wolff, Deputy City Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
[Opinion certified for partial publication.[*]]
OPINION
COOPERMAN, J.
Following a jury trial, defendant Roger Kenneth Trantham was found guilty as charged in a misdemeanor complaint with entering,…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nunez v. City Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Nunez v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- City & County of San Francisco v. Eller Outdoor AdvertisingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. DavenportAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1985
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.