Legal Opinion

Hertz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1927No. 7465PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENYON, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota removed plaintiff in error from his office as attorney and counselor of that court, and ordered his name stricken from the record of those entitled to practice therein. He brings writ of error.

One Leon Gleekman and others were in-dieted in 1922 in the United States District Court for Minnesota and charged with the crime of conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138% et seq.). At the conclusion of the government’s case, tried before Hon. Page Morris, said Gleekman and two other of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Booth v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Wallie W. Mattice, and Paul Rhodes v. Clarence A. H. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  5. National Union Fire Insurance v. Alticor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API