Clay v. Pope & Cottle Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The plaintiff brings this action to recover for personal injuries, and for damage to his automobile resulting from its collision with a truck owned by the defendant. At the close of the evidence the defendant filed a motion for a directed verdict, which was denied subject to its exception. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The case is reported to this court with the stipulation that if the judge erred in submitting the case to the jury, judgment is to be entered for the defendant; otherwise judgment is to be entered on the verdict.
The accident occurred April 20, 1928, on Elm…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gibb v. HardwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Gallup v. LazottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Salisbury v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Di Rienzo v. GoldfarbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Haynes v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Noyes v. RaymondMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Dzura v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Gross v. Boston, W. N.Y. St. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Hladick v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.